Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Can someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?

PleaseCan someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?Yes. We call it "pork barrel" when it was placed in the legislation to "buy a vote."

In Congress you need to have a majority of the people vote for a measure. So, let's say you need 182 votes to get a spending bill passed that would maintain our Highway Department. This make-believe "Highway Department Maintenance" Bill is "ear-marked" by the President--that is, he has asked for this money to perform a specific task. But, the Executive Branch has no right to put up any legislation--only the House of Representatives can propose a spending bill. But in the House, there are only 65 Representatives that really care about it. There are another 20 that will vote for it, because, well who knows why, they just will. That gives you only 85 votes, and you need 182. How will you get the other 97 to vote for it.

Well one of them up and says, "I don't like this bill--however, I think it would be palatable if $1,000,000.00 is budgeted to build a new bridge in my district." His vote can be bought--and that is a "pork-barrell" project. It isn't necessary for the Highways to be maintained. It is just something that will keep a whole lot of people in his district for the next 2-years designing, building, and otherwise happily working on. 86 votes down, 96-to-go. When the final vote comes down, the earmarked program--the one that was really requested--now has 97 other projects being built that have nothing to do with the program the US really wanted, and needed.

The bill we wanted was the "earmarked" expenditure.

The one that Congressmen added to it to insure their personal votes, were the "pork-barrel" pieces.

Sometimes, the bill ends up spending more money on the pork-barrel projects than it actually spent doing what it was originally intended to do!Can someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?
Let's get it straight that these two terms do not (DO NOT) mean the same thing. In checking the dictionary first, I find that "Port barrel" is a term that means legislation addeded to a bill or budget that benefits few people or only people in a specific district.

Report Abuse

Can someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?Ear-marked is pork-barrel. There's no difference. It's just a way the slick politicians separate themselves from the cheap ones.Can someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?
Earmarking is difficult to explain, so I'll just give you the Wikipedia page where its explained.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earmark



I could explain pork barrel, but since I'm on Wikipedia already, I might as well just give you the page for that too. :)



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork_barrel鈥?/a>





If you still dont understand, say so. And I can try to put 'em both in layman's terms.Can someone explain the difference between pork-barrel legislation and an earmark?An earmark has already been allocated. Pork-

Barrel is over the top legislation. IE $25m. to

study the nature of lint on cashmire
  • book club recommendations
  • superchips
  • What is the main argument for pork-barrel legislation?

    I need two sentences and know its not home work im 22What is the main argument for pork-barrel legislation?FOR: Politician's buy their constituent's votes by bringing home "pork/projects" that only benefit his district. Thus making them beholden to them for their special positions on committee's.



    AGAINST: Tax Payer dollars are meant to benefit all taxpayers!What is the main argument for pork-barrel legislation?Pork is in the eye of the beholder. Even the "bridge to nowhere" was supposed to connect a landlocked small city to it's airport. The state had put the airport out of reach of the city on the understanding that the bridge would be built.What is the main argument for pork-barrel legislation?Pork-barrel legislation promotes business within the district of a person's representative. It does help within a district, but hurts the country as a whole.What is the main argument for pork-barrel legislation?
    Because FOX NEWS wants it.

    Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?

    When its moderate members of their own party that are kicking their Far Left agenda to the curbWhy do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?That's the democrat way. Look at any city run by democrats around the country: they r'e all messes. And what do the people there allsay: "It's the Reppublican's fault".Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?
    because they are too stupid to realize their party controls both houses and has enough votes to pass anything they want( the climate bill proved that)Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?What exactly is so bad about socialism anyway? Most western European countries have this type of government and you will never see the kind of poverty that exists in many developing countries where there is a huge disparity in wealth. The fact of the matter is that capitalism requires a huge permanent underclass just to survive.Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?
    Cause its their fault.Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?Maybe it has something to do with the Republicans that that generalize Democrats as "Obamatards" and calling ACTUAL CAPITALISTIC legislation that give MORE FREE MARKET OPTIONS to the public "Socialist". But hey, I'm just using my brain. I know, that's not expected in cases like this.Why do Obotards continue to blame Republicans for the lack of passage of their Socialist legislation?
    It has to do with whomever is leaning right on this agenda. Leaning right meaning that they are being paid off by the insurance companies. Republicans are so rediculous they don't even know why this healthcare will HELP THEM.

    Do you think that the same-sex marriage legislation advanced by Governor Paterson can pass the Assembly now?

    I honestly don't think so, and I'm a supporter of gay marriage.



    I think this is just a stunt that Paterson's pulling so he can divert attention from being such a pathetic, awful, miserable, terrible, abysmal governor.



    (And no, I don't think he has even a *chance* of being re-elected!)



    Your thoughts?Do you think that the same-sex marriage legislation advanced by Governor Paterson can pass the Assembly now?Sadly, I agree with your assessment of the legislation's chances in this session. Paterson may be trying to generate some buzz among the Democratic base, which has gotten really frustrated with him recently. I'm optimistic that within a few years, I'll have the right to marry my partner in NYS -- but I do not think it will happen before our twelfth anniversary this fall.Do you think that the same-sex marriage legislation advanced by Governor Paterson can pass the Assembly now?Not if the Catholic church can help it. Read an article that the NY archbishop is gearing up for war on this one against the bill

    What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?

    Zero. None. Nil. Nada.



    Dastardly, equating gay marriage to Civil Rights is insulting.



    L, please explain how it is bigotted to want to preserve the sanctity of marriage?What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?Gay marriage for one...What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?
    Nothing, the civil right leaders in the past where or are Republicans.

    MLK (R)What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was introduced by JFK
    Nothing that I can think of. The majority of votes against the Civil Rights act of 1964 were from Democrats



    Senate Democrat :

    "We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?Really? You know Yahoo is a search engine, Right? The civil rights legislation of the 1960s was championed by LBJ. It caused the Dixicrats to move to the GOP. You can thank them for the serious racist streak that runs through the Right today.What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?
    None unless you count gay marriage in a few liberal states
    No-fault divorce (Some people may not like it, but it does break up a loveless marriage), gay rights, the more recent black rights, which are used to try and limit segregation.

    Porch Monkey: And not doing so is bigotted.

    Noone" You are discriminating against someones way of life, for absolutely no good reason. That is bigotry.What civil rights legislation are the Democrats responsible for?
    hello dolly. good answer. dems were also responsible for

    registering his relatives in the hills to vote.
    LBJ, (he was a Democrat) signed the first Civil Rights Act the year after JFK was killed
    All of it, the republicans are only responsible for trampling them down.



    Which is why so many of us ask, "Why doesn't the right wing love America like the liberals do?"
    wait I know this

    .

    .

    .

    dang you got me. I know oral sex in the white house....Thanks Bill....
    Jim Crow laws
    All the major ones were passed by Republicans.



    Blue- JFK may have introduced the Civil Rights Act, but DEMOCRATS fillabustered it for literally weeks. Old school fillabuster where you had to sleep in the Senate to make sure the other side didn't have enough votes stop the fillabuster.

    What was some major legislation James Buchanan was involved in?

    I cannot find anyWhat was some major legislation James Buchanan was involved in?there is no such legislation.

    Would you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?

    Just wondering how many of you would out there.



    Audit, keyword. By that I mean not necessarily dis-band or any of that in this question. just, would you like to know what's going on?Would you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?If you change the Federal Reserve into "Treasury Bank" we're in business. Corruption is key once you get the name right.Would you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?
    Absolutely, of course once said audit is completed the call for disbanding the FED will certainly follow, assuming lynch mobs don't form before congress can act.Would you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?I have already sent my petitions to audit the fed. I have joined the group and I am a member at "End the Fed". I also support Ron Paul and am doing my part to get him elected as President.
    yes the reserve bank is not run by the government its run privately, it was illegal and unconstitutional when is created by all Yale Skull and bones members and they just got exposed

    http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/鈥?/a>



    Thomas Jefferson said something like the Reserve Banks will destroy AmericaWould you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?Audit, with the subsequent intention to disband.Would you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?
    Immediately
    Yes, they shouldn't be exempt just like any other private owned companyWould you support legislation to audit the Federal Reserve Bank?
    Yes, I think that is a good step. However I strongly support abolishing the fed.
    Yes. I would also support Ending the Fed