There's no specific laws for the homeless. (there is social sevrvices, but that's not just for the homeless.)What are some of the laws and legislation set up to protect the homeless?I don't know about your state but each state does have a provision in the laws for weather..in other words if it's really cold they won't kick them off the heating grills...Otherwise homeless people are given the same protections under the law and non homeless people.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
What are some of the laws and legislation set up to protect the homeless?
Does anyone know?What are some of the laws and legislation set up to protect the homeless?most shelters, food banks and soup kitchens are run by charities, that is to say, NOT the government. (most often, some kind of church.)
There's no specific laws for the homeless. (there is social sevrvices, but that's not just for the homeless.)What are some of the laws and legislation set up to protect the homeless?I don't know about your state but each state does have a provision in the laws for weather..in other words if it's really cold they won't kick them off the heating grills...Otherwise homeless people are given the same protections under the law and non homeless people.english to arabic superchips
There's no specific laws for the homeless. (there is social sevrvices, but that's not just for the homeless.)What are some of the laws and legislation set up to protect the homeless?I don't know about your state but each state does have a provision in the laws for weather..in other words if it's really cold they won't kick them off the heating grills...Otherwise homeless people are given the same protections under the law and non homeless people.
How do you find recent delegated legislation that has been made?
OPSI (the ridiculous 'new' name of Her Majesty's Stationery Office)
The chronological tables are at:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/stat.htm
These are from 1987 onwards and since you wanted 'recent' secondary legislation, these are presumably the ones you require.
If you only know the name of the secondary legislation, you can search by name.
The OPSI site also has functionality for an RSS feed for new secondary (ie delegated ) legislation at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/whats鈥?/a>
Remember, you'll have to search separately on OPSI for delegated legislation for the devolved parts of the UK
The secondary legislation does not contain the amended versions of the instruments, obviously.
How do you find recent delegated legislation that has been made?Halsbury's Statutory Instruments in the public library. Go to a loose leaf update and hope it is updated. If you want to go further The stationary office (HMSO) will sell you copies. You will need to be more specific than this How do you find recent delegated legislation that has been made?http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk is a useful source for older legislation
Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?
Both parties, Republican and Democratic, are the only two major parties in todays political system. Are we allowing them to degredade our system of governing. This is susposed to be a system of the people and by the people. Most politicians in the big arena have millions of dollars, yet most of americans don't. Should there be a working class party?
Don't get me confused, I am not suggesting Ron Paul?Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?They two party system has worked in the past, but now with this current administration it has been broken. The only way to fix this problem is to introduce a four party system. This way there is balance because no one side controls the congress or the house. They have to actually debate the issues not pat each others back by passing bills that are full of ear marks and pork belly spending.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?The two party systems have created Corporate US Government. Bush is the President of this Corporate US Government. The Agencies of this Corporate US Government are sub-corporations. Our Republic is not represented by this Corporate US Government but it is controlled by this Corporate US Government. This Corporate US Government is based on commerce. The Corporate US Government Department of Justice does not administer law based on Constitutional law. The Corporate US Government Department of Justice administers law based on ADMIRALTY LAW (commerce). We the People, need to take back our Republic so that the voice of the People can control their own Government. The American Public must be educated and wake up to these facts as they exist.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?No its being erodded by liberal judges making laws form the bench, instead of following the laws congress makes.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?
It would be nice to have an Independent Minority in the House to keep both parties in Check.
Don't get me confused, I am not suggesting Ron Paul?Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?They two party system has worked in the past, but now with this current administration it has been broken. The only way to fix this problem is to introduce a four party system. This way there is balance because no one side controls the congress or the house. They have to actually debate the issues not pat each others back by passing bills that are full of ear marks and pork belly spending.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?The two party systems have created Corporate US Government. Bush is the President of this Corporate US Government. The Agencies of this Corporate US Government are sub-corporations. Our Republic is not represented by this Corporate US Government but it is controlled by this Corporate US Government. This Corporate US Government is based on commerce. The Corporate US Government Department of Justice does not administer law based on Constitutional law. The Corporate US Government Department of Justice administers law based on ADMIRALTY LAW (commerce). We the People, need to take back our Republic so that the voice of the People can control their own Government. The American Public must be educated and wake up to these facts as they exist.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?No its being erodded by liberal judges making laws form the bench, instead of following the laws congress makes.Is the American system of legislation being eroded by only having two parties?
It would be nice to have an Independent Minority in the House to keep both parties in Check.
Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?
which forms of self anesthetization drugs are legalized?
I never thought I would be asking this question here, but the question never seems to go away. What is your opinion?Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?May I offer the following as food for thought.
As a police officer, I see more issues involved with the usage of these two elements
than most civilians do in a life time. My uniformed officers deal with the front line issues
involved in the usage of both, I could list statistics till the cows come home, on how much
of a negative effect these two elements have on our society, Most Domestic assaults are
caused by alcohol or drugs. Either one or the other household member becomes a victim.
Domestic violence is a train wreck looking to occur when either party is involved with the above.
25% of the Homicides I handle are alcohol or direct drug usage involved.
40% of the Armed Robbery's in my jurisdiction are related to drugs or alcohol usage.
These are social issues that are trying to be handled criminally and through legislation. Both
are failing miserably. Interdiction. Rehabilitation. Treatment. Are the keys to success of lessening
these problems.
Until we come to a meeting of the minds on how best to deal with the above problems, I will
be looking at increased statistics. Thanks for asking, Just a thought.Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?This subject tends to be controversial for any number of reasons.
Substance abuse takes many forms, and not all the substances are illegal or even regulated. One can argue against any substance that can be abused based on its potential for abuse. One can argue in favor of them as being beneficial if not abused.
I liked the first answer to this question from the police officer, because he deals with the specific problems abuse of these two substances (and other illegal drugs besides marijuana) cause. Note I said abuse. That can be extended to include trafficking issues.
The majority of people who use alcohol do so responsibly and in moderation. Those who abuse it cause any number of problems and not everyone who abuses it abuses it all the time. Responsible alcohol use means keeping it under control and not driving if enough has been consumed to impair. Alcoholism is a condition that affects a comparatively small percentage of alcohol consumers. It is a complex issue. I believe alcohol should be legal and its use regulated. I favor a legal drinking age of 21 and that driving while intoxicated should be punished at least as severely as it is now, but much more consistently. It should be noted that past attempts to prohibit sale and use of alcoholic beverages resulted in very high profits for organized crime. Also, some doctors say a moderate consumption of alcohol can have positive health benefits.
Marijuana is a bit more complex. While it has been argued that its effects are less damaging than those of alcohol, as an illegal substance there is little or no quality control. At a time when this society is trying to limit or eliminate tobacco use it makes little sense to increase the access and acceptability of a drug that must be smoked to have whatever effects it is going to have. It would seem to me that the active ingredient--if found to have a beneficial medical effect--should be legal if it can be produced in a different form such as a pill or liquid and if its quality and effect can be regulated. It should also be noted that as an illegal drug, marijuana is far more profitable than it would be if it were legal and regulated.
I've never used marijuana. I have used alcohol and have on occasion abused it.
Under no circumstances, regardless of what legal status these drugs are given, should socially harmful abuse or illegal trafficking be allowed or encouraged.
It seems to me that our society should be trying to find out what social inducements exist that result in any drug being abused. The culprit might well be not the drug, but the social environment that leads to its abuse. If we can find ways to make smoking less acceptable and less practiced we should be able to find ways to halt abuse of drugs, illegal, legal, or regulated.
Long answer, and I hope it makes sense.Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?Do you live in a dry county?
Be sure here you can wash your car with Chablis in Burgundy only the description care will make you drunk!don't smell the screen
there is a difference between alcololic beverages and Marijuana we call this **** Haschich muslim word
translation murderer.
I have seen what plan Ron Paul to shortsocket traffics:free markett!
About drugattic a prescription would be a better solution to limit to control .Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?
Alcohol is taxed about 100%.
MJ isn't that is how they decide:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$…
I never thought I would be asking this question here, but the question never seems to go away. What is your opinion?Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?May I offer the following as food for thought.
As a police officer, I see more issues involved with the usage of these two elements
than most civilians do in a life time. My uniformed officers deal with the front line issues
involved in the usage of both, I could list statistics till the cows come home, on how much
of a negative effect these two elements have on our society, Most Domestic assaults are
caused by alcohol or drugs. Either one or the other household member becomes a victim.
Domestic violence is a train wreck looking to occur when either party is involved with the above.
25% of the Homicides I handle are alcohol or direct drug usage involved.
40% of the Armed Robbery's in my jurisdiction are related to drugs or alcohol usage.
These are social issues that are trying to be handled criminally and through legislation. Both
are failing miserably. Interdiction. Rehabilitation. Treatment. Are the keys to success of lessening
these problems.
Until we come to a meeting of the minds on how best to deal with the above problems, I will
be looking at increased statistics. Thanks for asking, Just a thought.Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?This subject tends to be controversial for any number of reasons.
Substance abuse takes many forms, and not all the substances are illegal or even regulated. One can argue against any substance that can be abused based on its potential for abuse. One can argue in favor of them as being beneficial if not abused.
I liked the first answer to this question from the police officer, because he deals with the specific problems abuse of these two substances (and other illegal drugs besides marijuana) cause. Note I said abuse. That can be extended to include trafficking issues.
The majority of people who use alcohol do so responsibly and in moderation. Those who abuse it cause any number of problems and not everyone who abuses it abuses it all the time. Responsible alcohol use means keeping it under control and not driving if enough has been consumed to impair. Alcoholism is a condition that affects a comparatively small percentage of alcohol consumers. It is a complex issue. I believe alcohol should be legal and its use regulated. I favor a legal drinking age of 21 and that driving while intoxicated should be punished at least as severely as it is now, but much more consistently. It should be noted that past attempts to prohibit sale and use of alcoholic beverages resulted in very high profits for organized crime. Also, some doctors say a moderate consumption of alcohol can have positive health benefits.
Marijuana is a bit more complex. While it has been argued that its effects are less damaging than those of alcohol, as an illegal substance there is little or no quality control. At a time when this society is trying to limit or eliminate tobacco use it makes little sense to increase the access and acceptability of a drug that must be smoked to have whatever effects it is going to have. It would seem to me that the active ingredient--if found to have a beneficial medical effect--should be legal if it can be produced in a different form such as a pill or liquid and if its quality and effect can be regulated. It should also be noted that as an illegal drug, marijuana is far more profitable than it would be if it were legal and regulated.
I've never used marijuana. I have used alcohol and have on occasion abused it.
Under no circumstances, regardless of what legal status these drugs are given, should socially harmful abuse or illegal trafficking be allowed or encouraged.
It seems to me that our society should be trying to find out what social inducements exist that result in any drug being abused. The culprit might well be not the drug, but the social environment that leads to its abuse. If we can find ways to make smoking less acceptable and less practiced we should be able to find ways to halt abuse of drugs, illegal, legal, or regulated.
Long answer, and I hope it makes sense.Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?Do you live in a dry county?
Be sure here you can wash your car with Chablis in Burgundy only the description care will make you drunk!don't smell the screen
there is a difference between alcololic beverages and Marijuana we call this **** Haschich muslim word
translation murderer.
I have seen what plan Ron Paul to shortsocket traffics:free markett!
About drugattic a prescription would be a better solution to limit to control .Legislation of marijuana and alcohol: How do lawmakers decide?
Alcohol is taxed about 100%.
MJ isn't that is how they decide:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$…
Isn't it ironic that Obama is outraising McCain, when McCain's signature legislation was campaign finance?
It sure says alot about the effectiveness of McCain-Feingold doesn't it?
Now we hear Republicans complaining about Obama "buying" this election. So which is it? Is Obama "buying" the election, which proves that McCain's most famous legislative accomplishment is effectively useless? Or is he playing fair, and the Maverick(tm)'s legislation is helping to keep the playing field even and keep big money from ruining Washington, DC?Isn't it ironic that Obama is outraising McCain, when McCain's signature legislation was campaign finance?McCain is exploiting loopholes in his own campaign finance laws, for example...the RNC is allowed to run campaign ads on his behalf, without actually donating to the campaign....this somewhat levels the playing field, but it isn't even close to the funds Obama has at his disposal.Isn't it ironic that Obama is outraising McCain, when McCain's signature legislation was campaign finance?In order for intelligence to exist, there has to be stupidity
Now we hear Republicans complaining about Obama "buying" this election. So which is it? Is Obama "buying" the election, which proves that McCain's most famous legislative accomplishment is effectively useless? Or is he playing fair, and the Maverick(tm)'s legislation is helping to keep the playing field even and keep big money from ruining Washington, DC?Isn't it ironic that Obama is outraising McCain, when McCain's signature legislation was campaign finance?McCain is exploiting loopholes in his own campaign finance laws, for example...the RNC is allowed to run campaign ads on his behalf, without actually donating to the campaign....this somewhat levels the playing field, but it isn't even close to the funds Obama has at his disposal.Isn't it ironic that Obama is outraising McCain, when McCain's signature legislation was campaign finance?In order for intelligence to exist, there has to be stupidity
I have a question about the proposed legislation for the extension of the housing tax credit.?
If the new legislation is passed and the income limitations are removed, would I be able to claim the credit even though I purchased my house earlier in the year?I have a question about the proposed legislation for the extension of the housing tax credit.?Since nothing has been passed in to law there's NO possible way to answer the question.
The odds of another credit are not that hot. Sales tend to slump during the winter months anyway, so I'd speculate that no action will be taken until late Winter or early Spring. That of course is only a guess.
The odds of a larger credit or higher income limits or removal of the first time buyer requirement are even less.
The odds that it would be retro-active to any purchases in 2009 are pretty much zero. Congress surprised everyone when the current credit was back-dated to January 1, 2009. That proves that anything CAN happen, but don't hold your breath!cb radio translate japanese to english
The odds of another credit are not that hot. Sales tend to slump during the winter months anyway, so I'd speculate that no action will be taken until late Winter or early Spring. That of course is only a guess.
The odds of a larger credit or higher income limits or removal of the first time buyer requirement are even less.
The odds that it would be retro-active to any purchases in 2009 are pretty much zero. Congress surprised everyone when the current credit was back-dated to January 1, 2009. That proves that anything CAN happen, but don't hold your breath!
Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?
I think the laws are hypocritical. Your views.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?As a gay, I'm against hate crime laws. For me, a crime is a crime..a murder is a murder. The *why* really isn't all that important, unless of course, mental illness played a part.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?
It depends on how they're implemented. Nothing should abridge free speech or the free exercise of religion (or irreligion). To that end, I think that hate crime legislation should apply to religious groups. Jerks who terrorize a group of people with violence should fall under hate crime legislation.
I'm not sure how effective hate crime legislation is. People don't go gay bashing because they're rational, or because they fear the law.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?Bad. Crime is crime. There are already laws to prevent violence, etc, against people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, creed, etc.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?
Hate crime legislation is a good thing, people who's are motivated by hate deserve more time in the slammer.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?Hate crimes are sadly NECESSARY to add Penalty to Perpetrator!!
It depends on how they're implemented. Nothing should abridge free speech or the free exercise of religion (or irreligion). To that end, I think that hate crime legislation should apply to religious groups. Jerks who terrorize a group of people with violence should fall under hate crime legislation.
I'm not sure how effective hate crime legislation is. People don't go gay bashing because they're rational, or because they fear the law.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?Bad. Crime is crime. There are already laws to prevent violence, etc, against people, regardless of gender, race, sexuality, creed, etc.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?
Hate crime legislation is a good thing, people who's are motivated by hate deserve more time in the slammer.Gays: Do you think hate crime legislation is good or bad?Hate crimes are sadly NECESSARY to add Penalty to Perpetrator!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)