What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?

Is it to curb man-made global warming??





But if man is causing global warming via CO2 emissions then HOW did the last ice age end??What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?What the hell, man. Don't you know the Maunder Minimum and Holocene are myths? The day a guy named Tran rode his Honda through Ho Chi Minh City is when the Earth became doomedWhat is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?
Global Warming is a hoax. I cant see why so many people buy into this. Oh wait, Obama was elected, I do see why.What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?The spread of ice produces further cooling by reflecting more of the Sun's energy back into space. But ice on land blocks the chemical weathering of rocks that removes CO2 from the atmosphere, which leads to warming as levels rise.
The stated goal: Save planet earth from certain destruction.



The actual goal: Provide a mechanism for government regulation of commerce and industry.What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?Well, first, the rationale behind a cap and trade system isn't just to curb global warming. In fact, that's not even the main reason. It's to shift the economy away from oil, and other non-renewable resources. To create a more sustainable energy economy. It's as much a long term economic plan as it is a global warming plan.



Ice ages are cyclical. The world would be warming anyway(without man-made global warming) and an ice age would eventually occur. It's like a scale that tips back and forth. The idea is carbon trapped in the atmosphere is speeding up the warming process, not causing it.What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?
The idea is that CO2 emissions are a negative externality. That is, a 'bad' (as opposed to a 'good') that is experienced in the aggregate. All polution falls into the same category. The government often uses regulations to recognize or limit negative externalities.



Cap %26amp; Trade is an economically viable form of regulation in which total production of a negative externality is monitored and limitted, and producers are allowed to buy %26amp; sell 'offsets' that determine the total amount of production they are permitted. For instance, a company that produces a lot of CO2 running a coal-fired power plant would recieve a certain number of offsets representing the permitted CO2 production of that plant. If they shut the plant down more often, so they didn't need to use all thier offsets, they could sell the remainder to other companies wishing to expand CO2 producing operations.



While it's economically viable, the question of whether CO2 really /is/ a negative externality rests on the harm it does in the agregate. If it's really causing global warming, yes, it's clearly a negative externality. If not, then the Cap %26amp; Trade regulations would be unnecessary - but they'd still be workable.
Taxes and control. Wrapped in hocus-pocus science to keep the sheep from revolting.What is the rationale for passing legislation to cap CO2 emissions?
it's really to stimulate the oxygen tank union