If the gov't really wants to be helpful they should raise the limit on how much we can earn!Will the new Social Security legislation affect those already receiving benefits?I was just about to close this question until I came to the line that said, "If the gov't really wants to be helpful they should raise the limit on how much we can earn!"
lmao
Do you really think they want to be helpful?
lpWill the new Social Security legislation affect those already receiving benefits?Why at least you understand there is a distinct probability that the Government does not WANT to be HELPFUL, but "it" rather wants to utterly dominate EVERYTHING ALL THE TIME, unless such force is reacted upon or anticipated by responsible civilians with enough collective wherewithal to utterly DEFEAT THEM AT WILL, or at the very least choose a foreign entity to aid in DEFEATING THEM AT WILL.
If there exists no balance of power, there exists no BALANCE OF POWER. And absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Thus the first REQUIREMENT is a government that allows for a private press ungoverned by such shams as "family court" restrictions on business licenses AS THESE courts USE proxies with date rape drugs to embarrass and ROB US CITIZENS of literally everything they will ever own, and their every right to business or EMPLOYMENT while threatening the very real and present LIKELIHOOD of DEATH cause by PRISON WITHOUT MEANINGFUL TRIAL, or PUBLIC HEARING.
For instance, do "liberals" (drug / Mafia speak for a person who wants to live the American Dream via the free market system) get a RIGHT to Social Security? Absolutely not. Under "our" government's current 30+ year long "case laws" they get the "RIGHT" to be treated as tax kleptomaniacs, involuntarily and without notice drugged out of their minds, and thus the PROTECTED PROPERTY RIGHTS, outweighs utterly the right of a "MENTAL PERSON" to any more rights than the brain dead without family on a respirator... to quote Emmons Versus Peet current GOVERNING Maine case law on the relative merits of various "classes of civil rights".
The brain dead on "artificial reparation" are not legally entitled to ANYTHING, but such respiration as allows the most organ tissue to be "harvested" ("artificial respiration" IS "legally" in some courts considered to BE the whole government financial support system for "Liberals" ~ as the IMPUDENT PRESUMPTION IS that Liberals couldn't make it like a drug dealer ~ the heroes of the current courts~ or else why is the FEDERAL punishment of deadbeat dads over that punishment doled out to the likes of Freeway Ricky Ross who was convicted of selling more cocaine than anyone in the history of California in the Iran Contra Era? And no, courts Do Not censure or even pay attention to one another, much less Congress).
The last time we had a serious look into the court system was JFK. His 1960-1 Prison report qualified the entirety of courts as sub human in their treatment of CIVIL "lawbreakers", such as deadbeat dads and vagrants, who are now one again going to JAIL without trial. But back in 1961 JFK was our Government. Not George Walker Bush by proxy. When he found things were amiss, he TOLD PEOPLE. And the 1960's were some of our nation's best in terms of intellectual property right derived GDP, peaking at well over the 70% of our GDP.
So, the nation in order to "protect capital", in money, which as "soft money" was not even in existence in it's present form when the nation was founded, is tossing away intellectual property rights, which are specifically protected under the Constitution.
So the nation's courts, in order to "protect" the rights of children impoverishes 1/3 + of them, places 100,000,000 citizens in jail or on parole so-as to seize business rights and as Carl Marx said: Govern by means of controlling the means of Production, when Carl MARX was describing his perfect COMMUNIST system of GOVERNMENT.
My God, do they have to hit you on the heads with wet noodles?
THESE ARE COMMIES. THEY LIE AND STEAL FOR A LIVING.Will the new Social Security legislation affect those already receiving benefits?I would opt out today if I could. My benefits will be a pittance compared to what I am paying. Most American's are.Will the new Social Security legislation affect those already receiving benefits?
No. They're Grandfathered into the old standards.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment