Why or why not?Do you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?Well, that's certainly going to prevent nutjobs from trying to kill officials, right? Because we all know that crazy people intent on murdering politicians believe in strict adherance to the law.
Does it occur to anybody that the only people who would obey this law are law-abiding citizens who have Concealed Weapons Permits? And they're not the ones going around shooting people, anyway.
So what is the point of such knee-jerk legislation?Do you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?
Gun free zones are unconstitutional.
Anyways, considering the fact that in the past 200+ years people have been carrying guns well within 1000 feet of such officials, and there were very few acts of gun violence against those people in these past centuries, this proposed legislation stems from an unwarranted hysteria.Do you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?No. I don't. That is a violation of my rights. First of all, if someone is intent on doing harm with a gun, this will won't mean anything. Secondly, if more people had guns at this event, then the number of victims would be less than half of what it was.
Common sense thinking.
It's really simple. You can make all the laws you want. Laws are meaningless to criminals.
No, I do not. It is my right as a citizen to be armed. Thus being able to protect myself and my family. Had the soldiers at fort hood been armed, so many would not have died. As for being in the presence of the president...as long as obama is in office there are no worries of me being anywhere near.. I have heard enough of his lies to last a lifetime.Do you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?That is dumb. Even with a handgun I am a good enough shot to hit my target from that distance. I have taken feral hogs from at least a football field away with a Ruger Superblackhawk with a scope. People need to calm down and stop having kneejerk reactions all the time.
Act in haste, repent in Leisure.Do you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?
Do you think that someone who plans to shoot someone in one of those categories really cares that it's illegal to have the gun there?
Just another example of a meaningless piece of crap proposed in a knee-jerk reaction.
I support gun control legislation of using both hands and controlling the gun better
Its a shame this loon killed a little kid,
but its hard to feel sorry for a political hack who got shot in the head
obviously she's so brainless it hardly affected herDo you agree with the gun control legislation proposed by Republican Congressman Peter King?
No. If an individual is willing to risk a death penalty in order to murder a federal official, they will not be overly concerned about being fined for a 1000 foot penalty.
No. Laws do not stop people who are intent on committing a crime.
How the heck would it be enforced?
Does anyone actually think a law such as this would have stopped the Tucson shooter?
If so, explain how.
**** no.
Except for the president, these are just ordinary members of the society.
That being said, I don't even LOOK at my guns when the president is in town...
wow that would save a lot of lives especially when you can buy a sniper rifle and gps scope that can hit a target up to 2200 yards aways.
Nope, no need for it.
Government should be judged, at this time, by the laws taken off the books, not by the inane laws being added.
No if they are to scared to meet the public let them retire. They should have body guards and most do.
What a load of crap.
That sounds reasonable.
First it's 1000 feet....
No, he's a tool, and the government SHOULD fear the people.
Yes, and I'm sorta pleasantly surprised this is coming from a Republican. It seems like pretty common sense legislation that should've been enacted way earlier. The government should fear the LEGITIMATE actions of the people, not their capacity for murder.
No comments:
Post a Comment